Splunk eval two fields into one11/23/2023 ![]() If the field name that you specify does not match a field in the output, a new field is added to the search results. Below a simple example: sourcetypeA s1field1 Purchase OK s1field2 9 s1field3 tax value s1field4 Completed sourcetypeB s2field1 9 s2field2 Rome. With drill down I pass the description by a token to the search that has to combine the search into a table. Try to use this form if you can, because it's usually most efficient. Description The eval command calculates an expression and puts the resulting value into a search results field. The logical flow starts from a bar char that group/count similar fields. If you are trying to take different events and connect them, then you need to use stats, join, lookup, or one of a half dozen other verbs, as appropriate to your use case. I have never heard of there being a performance gain by using the first method over the second method, so I always stick to the second method for backwards compatibility and readability. The arguments can be strings, multivalue fields or single value fields. The first example was supported starting in version 6.4 of Splunk. This part just generates some test data. ![]() So, heres one way you can mask the RealLocation with a display 'location' by checking to see if the RealLocation is the same as the prior record, using the autoregress function. You just want to report it in such a way that the Location doesnt appear. mvappend(X.) This function takes an arbitrary number of arguments and returns a multivalue result of all the values. Your data actually IS grouped the way you want. The answers you are getting have to do with testing whether fields on a single event are equal. eval field round(field, decimal place) Example round(4.56282,2) 4. Hi, see mvappends, works fine for me to agrregate 2 MV fileds into a new field. ![]() index'myindex' sourcetype'hamlet' environmentstaging top limit10 client eval percent round (percent) eval client mvindex (split (client. Your original post also included commands that looks to be able to correctly make the change, something like. I think you may be making some incorrect assumptions about how things work. The revised question does show a difference between actual output and desired output. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |